Research hotspots and trends of artificial intelligence ethics in medicine: A bibliometric analysis from 1999 to 2025

人工智能在医学伦理领域的研究热点和趋势:1999年至2025年的文献计量分析

阅读:6

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The exponential growth of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has raised critical ethical concerns. AIMS: To systematically identify research hotspots and trends of AI ethics in the medical field and provide evidence-based insights for future research. METHODS: A bibliometric analysis was conducted on publications from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to August 24, 2025. Visualisation tools were used to map the publication trend, as well as author, country, institution, journal, and keyword distributions. Keyword co-occurrence networks, clustering and burst analysis were employed to identify research hotspots and evolving trends. The results are reported following the BIBLIO checklist. RESULTS: A total of 1034 publications (291 from CNKI, 743 from WOSCC) were included. Key journals were Chinese Medical Ethics (CNKI) and Journal of Medical Ethics (WOSCC). China (n = 291) and the USA (n = 174) were the top publishing countries in CNKI and WOSCC, respectively. Leading institutional output came from developed countries (e.g., Harvard University, University of London, University of Toronto). Four research hotspots were identified: 1) ethical issues in different application scenarios of AI techniques in clinical practice, 2) AI ethical concerns and considerations in medical academia, 3) ethical challenges in AI-driven medical education, and 4) ethical governance, supervision, and review in healthcare. Keyword burst analysis indicated an increasing attention on balancing AI development with ethical governance, promoting research on complex intelligent tools embedded with ethical principles. CONCLUSION: Attention to this topic has grown steadily over the past eight years. Research trends reflect a shift from fragmentation to the integration of technology and ethics in medicine. Future research should further refine the operational definitions of ethical principles across diverse application scenarios to guide stakeholders in effectively integrating technology and ethics.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。