Abstract
BACKGROUND: Falling is an important public health issue because of its prevalence and severe consequences. Evaluating muscle performance is important when assessing fall risk. The study aimed to identify factors [namely muscle capacity (strength, quality, and power) and spatio-temporal gait attributes] that best discriminate between fallers and non-fallers in older adults. The hypothesis is that muscle quality, defined as the ratio of muscle strength to muscle mass, is the best predictor of fall risk. METHODS: 184 patients were included, 81% (n = 150) were women and the mean age was 73.6 ± 6.83 years. We compared body composition, mean grip strength, spatio-temporal parameters, and muscle capacity of fallers and non-fallers. Muscle quality was calculated as the ratio of maximum strength to fat-free mass. Mean handgrip and power were also controlled by fat-free mass. We performed univariate analysis, logistic regression, and ROC curves. RESULTS: The falling patients had lower muscle quality, muscle mass-controlled power, and mean weighted handgrip than the non-faller. Results showing that lower muscle quality increases fall risk (effect size = 0.891). Logistic regression confirmed muscle quality as a significant predictor (p < .001, OR = 0.82, CI [0.74; 0.89]). ROC curves demonstrated muscle quality as the most predictive factor of falling (AUC = 0.794). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study showed that muscle quality is the best predictor of fall risk, above spatial and temporal gait parameters. Our results underscore muscle quality as a clinically meaningful assessment and may be a useful complement to other assessments for fall prevention in the aging population.