Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Identifying patient-reported outcome measures allows management of urogenital prolapse to be tailored to reflect symptom bother and expectations of treatment. We devised a new single-item questionnaire, the Patient Perception of Prolapse Condition (PPPC), based on the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC). The aim was to evaluate the criterion validity, test/re-test reliability and responsiveness of the PPPC. METHODS: Women attending a tertiary urogynaecology clinic were recruited. At visit 1, patients completed the Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QOL) and PPPC questionnaires, and underwent a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examination. This allowed assessment of criterion validity using Spearman's rank correlation (rho) of the PPPC against validated subjective and objective outcomes. At visit 2, within the next 6 weeks, PPPC was repeated to assess test/re-test reliability using Cronbach's alpha (α). In those undergoing pelvic floor surgery, responsiveness of the PPPC was assessed at visit 3 by correlating PPPC and P-QOL scores 6 weeks post-operatively. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients attended visit 1, 60 attended visit 2 and 58 attended visit 3. At visit 1, there were moderate correlations between the PPPC and both objective (POP-Q: rho = 0.385, p < 0.01, CI 0.192-0.549) and subjective (P-QOL: rho = 0.635, p < 0.01, CI 0.493-0.744) measures confirming criterion validity. Test/re-test reliability was high (α = 0.89). Correlation with post-operative PPPC and P-QOL confirmed moderate responsiveness (rho = 0.54, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The PPPC, a novel single-item patient-reported measure of prolapse condition, demonstrated good criterion validity, test/re-test reliability and responsiveness. These findings support the use of the PPPC as a global assessment of prolapse condition.