Discharge prescription patterns in multiarterial versus single-arterial coronary artery bypass grafting: A regional multicenter cohort analysis

多支血管冠状动脉旁路移植术与单支血管冠状动脉旁路移植术出院处方模式的比较:一项区域多中心队列分析

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Medical management after multiarterial grafting (MAG) versus single arterial grafting (SAG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is less characterized. We sought to identify discharge prescription patterns after CABG on the basis of conduit selection. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients from a 17-institution regional collaborative undergoing isolated CABG from 2020 to 2023. Patients were stratified into MAG and SAG cohorts. Primary analysis included dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), anticoagulation, beta-blocker, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker discharge prescription rates. Multivariable logistic regression was executed to assess independent associations. RESULTS: The cohort included 10,966 patients (8904 SAG, 2062 MAG). Patients in the SAG group were significantly older with a median age of 67 years [61, 74] versus 61 years [55, 68] in the MAG cohort. Patients in the SAG group were more likely to present with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (34.1% vs 31.0%, P < .01) and greater Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality (1.1% vs 0.7%, P < .01). Patients in the MAG group were more likely to be prescribed DAPT (51.2% vs 70.6%, P < .01), amiodarone (54.2% vs 66.7%, P < .01) and less likely to be prescribed any anticoagulants (12.7% vs 9.1%, P < .01), warfarin (3.2% vs 1.5%, P < .01) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers (24.6% vs 19.8%, P < .01). After risk adjustment, MAG was independently associated with DAPT (odds ratio, 1.69 [1.4-2.0], P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing MAG are more likely to be prescribed DAPT at discharge, independent of clinical presentation and baseline comorbidities. Differences in postrevascularization medications between patients who receive MAG and SAG differ and should be considered when comparing groups and outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。