Does leaving native antegrade pulmonary blood flow at the time of the superior cavopulmonary connection impact long-term outcomes after the Fontan?

在进行上腔静脉肺动脉连接术时保留原有的顺行肺血流是否会影响 Fontan 术后的长期疗效?

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Antegrade pulmonary blood flow (APBF) may be left or eliminated at the time of the superior cavopulmonary connection (SCPC). Our aim was to assess the impact of leaving native APBF at the SCPC on long-term Fontan outcomes. METHODS: In the Australia and New Zealand Fontan Registry (1985-2021), 587 patients had pre-existing native APBF at the SCPC. At the SCPC, 302 patients had APBF eliminated (APBF(-)) and 285 patients had APBF maintained (APBF(+)). The incidence of Fontan failure (composite end point of Fontan takedown, transplant, plastic bronchitis, protein losing enteropathy and death) and atrioventricular (AV) valve repair/replacement post SCPC was compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Sex, predominant-ventricle morphology, isomerism, primary diagnosis, and age/type of Fontan were similar between groups. APBF(-) versus APBF(+) had a higher incidence of arch obstruction/coarctation (17% vs 7%) and previous pulmonary artery band (54% vs 45%) and a lower rate of Fontan fenestration (27% vs 41%). The risk of Fontan failure was similar between the 2 groups (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.78; P = .96). The risk of AV-valve repair/replacement was greater in APBF(+) versus APBF- (HR, 2.32; CI, 1.13-4.75; P = .022). The risk of AV-valve repair/replacement remained after adjustment for arch obstruction/coarctation, previous pulmonary artery band and Fontan fenestration (HR, 2.27; CI, 1.07-4.81; P = .033). CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining APBF at the time of the SCPC does not impact the risk of Fontan failure but may increase the incidence of AV-valve repair and/or replacement post-SCPC.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。