Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to simulate blood flow stagnation using computational fluid dynamics and to clarify the optimal design of segmental artery reattachment for thoracoabdominal aortic repair. METHODS: Blood flow stagnation, defined by low-velocity volume or area of the segmental artery, was simulated by a 3-dimensional model emulating the systolic phase. Four groups were evaluated: direct anastomosis, graft interposition, loop-graft, and end graft. Based on contemporary clinical studies, direct anastomosis can provide a superior patency rate than other reattachment methods. We hypothesized that stagnation of the blood flow is negatively associated with patency rates. Over time, velocity changes were evaluated. RESULTS: The direct anastomosis method led to the least blood flow stagnation, whilst the end-graft reattachment method resulted in worse blood flow stagnation. The loop-graft method was comparatively during late systole, which was also influenced by configuration of the side branch. Graft interposition using 20 mm showed a low-velocity area in the distal part of the side graft. When comparing length and diameter of an interposed graft, shorter and smaller branches resulted in less blood flow stagnation. CONCLUSIONS: In our simulation, direct anastomosis of the segmental artery resulted in the most efficient design in terms of blood flow stagnation. A shorter (<20 mm) and smaller (<10 mm) branch should be used for graft interposition. Loop-graft is an attractive alternative to direct anastomosis; however, its blood flow pattern can be influenced.