Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The 2018 change in the heart transplant allocation system resulted in greater use of temporary mechanical circulatory support. We hypothesized that the allocation change has increased hospital resource utilization, including length of stay and cost. METHODS: All heart transplant patients within a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database were included (2012-2020). Patients were stratified before and after the transplant allocation changes into early (January 2012-September 2018) and late eras (November 2018-June 2020). Costs were adjusted for inflation and presented in 2020 dollars. RESULTS: Of 535 heart transplants, there were 410 early and 125 late era patients. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for greater lung and valvular disease in the late era. Fewer patients in the late era were bridged with durable left ventricular assist devices (69% vs 31%; P < .0001), biventricular devices (5% vs 1%; P = .047), and more with temporary mechanical circulatory support (4% vs 46%; P < .0001). There was no difference in early mortality (6% vs 4%; P = .33) or major morbidity (57% vs 61%; P = .40). Length of stay was longer preoperatively (1 vs 9 days; P < .0001), but not different postoperatively. There was no difference in median total hospital cost ($132,465 vs $128,996; P = .15), although there was high variability. On multivariable regression, preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilization was the main driver of resource utilization. CONCLUSIONS: The new heart transplant allocation system has resulted in different bridging techniques, with greater reliance on temporary mechanical circulatory support. Although this is associated with an increase in preoperative length of stay, it did not translate into increased hospital cost.