Is More Always Better? A Randomized Comparative Clinical Trial About the Impact of Polydioxanone Threads Quantity for Facial Lifting

多多益善吗?一项关于聚二氧杂环己酮线材用量对面部提升效果影响的随机对照临床试验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive aesthetic procedures, such as the use of polydioxanone (PDO) threads, are increasingly popular for facial rejuvenation. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the impact of the number of PDO threads on tissue displacement, volume changes, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial involved 22 patients seeking facial lifting using PDO threads. Participants were divided into 2 groups: G1 with 3 threads per hemiface and G2 with 6 threads per hemiface. Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry was used to evaluate volumetric changes and tissue displacement at baseline, 20 days, and 60 days posttreatment. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). RESULTS: Significant volumetric changes were observed over time in both midface and lower face regions (P < .05), but no significant intergroup differences were found (P > .6). Tissue displacement showed statistical significance over time (P = .039) but not between groups (P = .821). GAIS scores did not differ significantly between groups or between patients and specialists. Adverse events were minor and transient, primarily involving pain. CONCLUSIONS: The number of PDO threads used did not significantly influence sustained lifting outcomes or patient satisfaction. Initial improvements in volume and tissue displacement diminished by 60 days, suggesting that additional threads do not enhance long-term efficacy. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to better understand collagen stimulation's potential role in lasting effects.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。