Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of endoscopic trans-ethmosphenoid optic canal decompression (ETOCD) and steroid pulse therapy (SPT) for indirect traumatic optic neuropathy (ITON). DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS: Total 140 monocular ITON patients from January 2017 to June 2019 were recruited, including 100 patients received ETOCD (56 patients received ETOCD only and 44 patients received ETOCD combined with SPT before surgery), and 40 patients received SPT only. Their visual acuity (VA) and visual evoked potential (VEP) were analysed before and after treatments. Initial VA, lag time, causes of injuries and age were analysed for evaluating prognosis of treatment. RESULTS: In contrast with patients received SPT only (15/40 = 38%), the effective rate of patients received ETOCD only and patients received ETOCD combined with SPT were both significantly better (46/56 = 82%, p < 0.001 and 30/44 = 68%, p = 0.005). Whether with SPT before ETOCD or not, after ETOCD, patients with VA improvement showed no significant difference. And 59/76 (77.6%) patients showed improvement within 24 hours. Patients who had residual visions achieved higher effective rate than those with no light perception (56/58 = 97% and 20/42 = 48%; p < 0.001) after ETOCD. For patients with long lag time of 21-90 days, 23/32 (72%) patients presented with vision improvement. Moreover, VEP was significantly improved after ETOCD. No severe complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic trans-ethmosphenoid optic canal decompression (ETOCD) is an effective and safe therapy for ITON, which is more effective than SPT. Even for patients with failure in responding to SPT, the successfully physical decompression is the most effective way to rescue optical nerve from permanent damage.