Abstract
In situ multiplexing analysis and in situ transcriptomics are now providing revolutionary tools to achieve the comprehension of the molecular basis of cancer and to progress towards personalized medicine to fight the disease. The complexity of these tasks requires a continuous interplay among different technologies during all the phases of the experimental procedures. New tools are thus needed and their characterization in terms of performances and limits is mandatory to reach the best resolution and sensitivity. We propose here a new experimental pipeline to obtain an optimized costs-to-benefits ratio thanks to the alternate employment of automated and manual procedures during all the phases of a multiplexing experiment from sample preparation to image collection and analysis. A comparison between ultra-fast and automated immunofluorescence staining and standard staining protocols has been carried out to compare the performances in terms of antigen saturation, background, signal-to-noise ratio and total duration. We then developed specific computational tools to collect data by automated analysis-driven fluorescence microscopy. Computer assisted selection of targeted areas with variable magnification and resolution allows employing confocal microscopy for a 3D high resolution analysis. Spatial resolution and sensitivity were thus maximized in a framework where the amount of stored data and the total requested time for the procedure were optimized and reduced with respect to a standard experimental approach.