Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant public health problem whose diagnosis and staging relies upon GFR-estimating equations, including the new CKD-EPI equation. CKD-EPI demonstrated superior performance compared with the existing MDRD equation but has not been applied to a healthcare system. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We identified 53,759 patients with stages 3 to 5 CKD on the basis of either MDRD or CKD-EPI equations using two eGFR values <60 ml/min per 1.73 m² > 90 days apart from an outpatient setting. We compared patient characteristics, presence of related diagnosis codes, and time CKD classification between equations. RESULTS: The number of patients identified with CKD decreased 10% applying CKD-EPI versus MDRD. Changes varied substantially by patient characteristics including a 35% decrease among patients < 60 years and a 10% increase among patients > 90 years. Women, non-African Americans, nondiabetics, and obese patients were less likely to be classified on the basis of CKD-EPI. Time to CKD classification was significantly longer with CKD-EPI among younger patients. 14% of patients identified with CKD on the basis of either estimating equation also had a related ICD-9 diagnosis, ranging from 19% among patients < 60 years to 7% among patients > 90 years. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with findings in the general population, CKD-EPI resulted in substantial declines in equation-based CKD diagnoses in a large healthcare system. Further research is needed to determine whether widespread use of CKD-EPI with current guidelines could lead to delayed needed care among younger patients or excessive referrals among older patients.