Tricuspid Transcatheter-Edge-to-Edge-Repair and Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement for Tricuspid Regurgitation: Patient Profiles and Outcomes

三尖瓣经导管缘对缘修复术和经导管三尖瓣置换术治疗三尖瓣反流:患者概况和预后

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) is typically reserved for patients in whom tricuspid valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) is deemed unsuitable or unlikely to provide effective treatment. Comparative data evaluating patient profiles, disease stage, and outcomes between T-TEER and TTVR are limited. We aimed to analyze and compare patient profiles, selection, and outcomes with either T-TEER or TTVR. METHODS: A total of 43 consecutive patients from May 2018 to April 2023 were retrospectively divided into 2 groups: Group-1 underwent T-TEER; and Group-2 underwent TTVR. Primary endpoints are as follows: inpatient mortality; and 30-day and 12-month mortality. Secondary endpoints are as follows: echocardiographic tricuspid regurgitationgrading; new pacemaker implantation; and heart failure-related readmissions at 30 days and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients underwent intervention (T-TEER, n = 14; TTVR, n = 29;). The mean age was 77.6 ± 10.3 years, and 38 patients (88%) were diagnosed with functional tricuspid regurgitation. The in-hospital mortality rate was 7%; the 30-day mortality rate was 12% with heart failure readmission for 14%.The 12-month mortality rate was 33%, with heart failure readmission for 37%. No in-hospital or 30-day mortality occurred in the T-TEER group. The 12-month mortality rate was 29% in the T-TEER group vs 34% in the TTVR group. The TTVR cohort showed numerically younger patients (76.2 ± 10.6 vs 80.4 ± 9.6 years, P = 0.24) and numerically higher TRI-scores (for tricuspid; 6.0, interquartile range [IQR], 4.0-7.0 vs 4.5, 1.5-5.75, P = 0.09). The calculated GLIDE-score (gap, location, image quality, density, en-face TR morphology) was significantly lower in the T-TEER cohort (P < 0.01). The length of hospitalization was significantly longer in the TTVR group (1, interquartile range, 1-4 vs 1, 1-1; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that patients undergoing T-TEER vs TTVR may represent different disease stages. Further data are required to determine the best patient selection for T-TEER vs TTVR to optimize patient outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。