Comparing the effects of manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on chronic tinnitus: a randomized controlled trial

比较手法针灸、电针灸和经皮神经电刺激对慢性耳鸣疗效的随机对照试验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the superiority of the effects of manual acupuncture (MA), electroacupuncture (EA), or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on chronic consecutive tinnitus. METHODS: Forty-five patients with chronic consecutive tinnitus were allocated into an MA, an EA, or a TENS group at a 1:1:1 ratio. The corresponding patients were treated with MA, EA, or TENS twice a week for 10 sessions (5 weeks). The primary outcome was a change in the tinnitus handicap inventory (THI), and the secondary outcomes were loudness and annoyance of tinnitus, pure-tone audiometry (PTA), and the speech discrimination test. The outcome measures were obtained at baseline, visit 5 (week 3), visit 10 (week 5), and visit 11 (follow-up 4 weeks). RESULTS: Of the 45 participants, 37 (82.22%) completed the study. There was no difference in the THI score change among the groups at any point. However, the number of participants who had reduced scores of more than 10 points was higher in the EA group than in the TENS or MA groups (p = 0.037, Fisher's exact test). There was no significant difference in the loudness and annoyance of tinnitus, PTA, and speech discrimination test findings among the groups. CONCLUSION: Among the MA, EA, and TENS groups, there was no significant difference in the effects on the treatment of chronic consecutive tinnitus. However, EA could respond to more patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on October 21, 2016 (KCT0002117 by CRIS).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。