A robust framework for evaluating green mines towards sustainable development

一个健全的框架,用于评估绿色矿山对可持续发展的影响

阅读:2

Abstract

The development of green mines is essential for promoting sustainability in the mining sector due to the significant ecological impacts of resource extraction. This study proposes a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework that integrates Spherical Fuzzy Sets (SFSs) with SWOT analysis, the CRITIC method, and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA). The framework introduces several innovations: it applies SFS-based MCDM for the first time to green mine evaluation in Egypt, structures 37 sustainability-related criteria under SWOT dimensions, and employs SF-CRITIC for objective weighting without subjective comparisons. The model is applied to assess 20 gold mines, where the SF-GRA method is used to rank alternatives based on proximity to an ideal solution. The results show that GME20 consistently ranks highest, while GME5 ranks lowest. A sensitivity analysis is conducted by varying the Grey relational coefficient and simulating 37 weight scenarios, demonstrating stable rankings and strong model resilience. Comparative analysis against ten SFS-based MCDM methods confirms the consistency of results, with Spearman correlation coefficients exceeding 0.77. In addition to its methodological novelty, the framework supports interpretable decision outcomes by identifying key sustainability drivers such as renewable energy adoption and land reclamation. This contributes actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders, enabling informed green investment and regulatory decisions. The study offers a transparent, reproducible, and scalable tool for sustainability evaluation in resource-intensive industries. The proposed model introduces a structured integration of SWOT-based criteria classification, objective weight computation via SF-CRITIC, and robust alternative ranking using SF-GRA. Furthermore, it contributes uniquely by applying the methodology to the underexplored context of green mine evaluation in Egypt. These distinctions articulate the methodological and application-based novelties of the proposed framework.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。