Abstract
PURPOSE: Little data is available on the efficiency of different implants for epiphysiodesis. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy between plates and staples in decreasing leg-length discrepancy. METHODS: A retrospective review of 19 children who underwent temporary epiphysiodesis of the legs was conducted, with a minimum of two years of follow-up. The bone length and length ratio to the short side were measured at six months, one year and two years postoperatively. The change in discrepancy was compared between staples and plates by an independent t-test, and the shortest time to a significant decrease in discrepancy was determined using a paired t-test. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent 13 staple procedures in nine femurs and four tibias for a 2.8-cm discrepancy at age 11.8 years, and nine patients underwent 14 plate procedures in seven femurs and seven tibias for a 3.1-cm discrepancy at age 12.4 years. Patients were followed up to skeletal maturity, except two. The use of staples decreased the discrepancy in the bone ratio from +4.8% to +1.2% in two years, and the use of plates decreased this ratio from +5.1% to +3.3% in two years. The change in the length ratio was significantly greater after stapling. Six months were required after stapling before the first significant decrease in discrepancy; it took two years after plating. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a significantly lower efficacy for decreasing leg-length discrepancy by tension band plating. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the limitations of using plates for suppressing bone growth. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.