Mechanisms of Mental-Health Disparities Among Minoritized Groups: How Well Are the Top Journals in Clinical Psychology Representing This Work?

少数群体心理健康差异的机制:临床心理学顶级期刊对这项工作的代表性如何?

阅读:1

Abstract

We have known for decades that mental health disparities exist among minoritized groups, including race, ethnicity, sexual identities, gender identity and expression, ability, and others. Theories and frameworks that incorporate stressors unique to the experiences of minoritized groups, such as the biopsychosocial model of racism (Clark et al, 1999) and minority stress model (Meyer, 2003), offer testable mechanisms that may help explain, in part, mental health disparities. However, research addressing mechanisms of these disparities is still scarce and is not well represented in our top clinical psychology journals. This review critically examines the extent to which top tier clinical psychology journals publish work examining mechanisms of mental health disparities among minoritized populations. We find very few studies have been published in top clinical psychology journals that address mechanisms of mental health disparities. We examine potential reasons for this and discuss recommendations for future research.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。