Conclusions
Laboratories should analytically and clinically verify hs-cTn assays before use, with attention to performance and the clinical and diagnostic algorithms that support appropriate testing and result interpretation. Work in the pre- and post-analytical phases is necessary to augment the analytical improvement in the new era of troponin testing.
Methods
Analytical verification included assessment of critical outlier frequency, for hs-cTnI and cTnI assays. Concordance for paired cTnI and hs-cTnI measurements (n=1096) was verified using 99th percentiles for both genders (cTnI: 30 ng/L, hs-cTnI: 25 ng/L) and for men and women separately (hs-cTnI: M: 34;F: 16 ng/L). Discordant data was correlated with clinical and laboratory information. Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) or Non-ACS was adjudicated by two cardiologists independently.
Results
The hs-cTnI assay showed a lower (10-fold) critical outlier rate (0.091%) and more detectable results above the limit of detection (LOD) (23.4%) and 99th percentile (2.4%), compared to cTnI. Analytical concordance between the two assays was high (94.5%) but decreased (91.7%) when gender-specific hs-cTnI cut-offs were used. The hs-cTnI assay gave fewer false negatives (up to 1.0%) but disproportionately more false positives (up to 6.7%) overall, which improved (3.9%) for serial measurements. Conclusions: Laboratories should analytically and clinically verify hs-cTn assays before use, with attention to performance and the clinical and diagnostic algorithms that support appropriate testing and result interpretation. Work in the pre- and post-analytical phases is necessary to augment the analytical improvement in the new era of troponin testing.