Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess PCWP with passive leg-lifting (PLL) and exercise, in two groups of patients presenting with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); one group with elevated NT-proBNP (eBNP), and one with normal NT-proBNP (nBNP) plasma concentration. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with eBNP (NT-proBNP ≥ 125 ng/l) and LVEF > 50%, were investigated and compared with 34 patients with nBNP (NT-proBNP < 125 ng/l) and LVEF > 50%. Both groups underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) at rest, PLL and exercise. From RHC, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), cardiac output (CO), and PCWP were measured. All nBNP patients had PCWP < 15 mmHg at rest, and a PCWP of < 25 mmHg with PLL and during exercise. Patients with eBNP had higher (p < 0.01) resting mPAP, PCWP, and mPAP/CO. These values increased with exercise; however, CO increased less in comparison with nBNP patients (p = 0.001). 20% of patients with eBNP had a PCWP > 15 mmHg at rest, this percentage increased to 47% with PLL and 41% had a PCWP > 25 mmHg during exercise. Of those with PCWP > 25 mmHg during exercise, 91% had a PCWP > 15 mmHg with PLL. A PCWP > 15 mmHg on PLL had a 91% sensitivity and 92% specificity in predicting exercise-induced PCWP of > 25 mmHg. CONCLUSION: In patients presenting with eBNP, PLL can predict which patients will develop elevated PCWP with exercise. These findings highlight the role of stress assessment.