Comparative Analysis on the Efficacy of Monopolar Radiofrequency With Continuous Water Cooling and Conventional Cryogen Spray Cooling in Facial Rejuvenation

单极射频连续水冷与传统冷冻喷雾冷却在面部年轻化治疗中的疗效比较分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) is widely used for non-invasive facial rejuvenation. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we compared the clinical efficacy and patient-reported procedural pain of a novel MRF system with continuous water cooling (RF-CWC) versus conventional MRF with cryogen spray cooling (RF-CSC) in 22 Asian women. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, split-face, single-blind trial, 22 participants received a single session of both RF-CWC and RF-CSC. Clinical outcomes-including changes in pore size, elasticity, skin density, fine lines, and lifting-were assessed over 8 weeks using quantitative measurements and investigator-assessed global improvement scores. Procedural pain was also recorded. To support the clinical findings, an ex vivo model was used to evaluate collagen and elastin fiber density, collagen I and III concentrations, and dermal temperature profiles. RESULTS: RF-CWC demonstrated clinical efficacy comparable to that of RF-CSC in terms of lifting, skin volume, and wrinkle reduction, while significantly reducing procedural pain. Ex vivo analysis confirmed enhanced collagen remodeling and efficient dermal heating with RF-CWC. CONCLUSION: RF-CWC offers a clinically effective and better-tolerated alternative to traditional cryogen-cooled MRF for facial rejuvenation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0010406.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。