Cement-implant interface gaps explain the poor results of CMW3 for femoral stem fixation: A cadaver study of migration, fatigue and mantle morphology

骨水泥-植入物界面间隙解释了CMW3用于股骨柄固定效果不佳的原因:一项关于迁移、疲劳和骨套形态的尸体研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register reported that CMW3 cement performed poorly for femoral stem fixation. METHODS: We implanted collared, satin-finished stems (Ra = 0.35 microm) into cadaver femora using CMW3 and with Simplex as control. Cement mantle function was quantified by stem migration after 300,000 cycles of "stair climbing". Cement cracks and interface gaps were quantified in transverse sections. RESULTS: The variances of the CMW3 migrations were substantially higher than for the control (p < 0.001): subsidence for CMW3: -32 (SD 42) microm, and for Simplex: -7 (SD 9) microm (p = 0.2); retroversion for CMW3: 0.60 degrees (SD 0.25), and for Simplex: 0.37 degrees (SD 0.04) (p = 0.08). Crack length-densities were similar. CMW3 had significantly more non-apposed stem/cement interface: 52% (SD 17) versus 33% (SD 8) (p = 0.04). Migrations could be predicted by the fraction of non-apposed stem/cement interface (retroversion: R(2)=0.80, p < 0.001; subsidence: R(2) = 0.46, p = 0.02) but not by cement cracks or non-apposed cement-bone interface. INTERPRETATION: We found that increased stem/cement non-apposition resulted in increased stem migration. Early migration is known to correlate with risk of revision. Thus, the higher stem-revision risk for CMW3 cement reported by the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register may have been due to inferior and variable stem/cement apposition.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。