Paediatric emergency departments should manage young febrile and afebrile infants the same if they have a fever before presenting

儿科急诊科应将就诊前已发热的婴幼儿(无论是否发热)采取相同的治疗方案。

阅读:1

Abstract

AIM: Our aim was to evaluate the risk of bacterial meningitis, bacteremia, and urinary tract infection (UTI) in infants ≤60 days who presented to paediatric emergency departments (PEDs) after having fever at home. We also investigated any differences between infants who were afebrile or febrile on presentation. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study of infants ≤60 days presented to four Swedish PEDs during 2014-2020 with reported fever at home. We used relative risks (RR) to compare the prevalence of UTI, bacteremia, and bacterial meningitis between the infants who were afebrile and the infants who were still febrile when they presented to the PED. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 1926 infants, and 702 (36%) were afebrile on presentation. The prevalence of UTI in the afebrile and febrile infants was 6.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.5-8.2] versus 14.2% (95% CI 12.3-16.2), corresponding to an RR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.31-0.59). In infants ≤28 days, the RR for meningitis was 1.05 (95% CI 0.18-6.23) for afebrile versus febrile infants. Five times more febrile infants underwent a lumbar puncture. CONCLUSION: Infants who were afebrile on presentation underwent fewer lumbar punctures, but they had similar rates of bacterial meningitis to febrile infants. Different management approaches are not justified.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。