Abstract
Detection of IgG in urine is an efficient method comparable to that in serum for diagnosis of strongyloidiasis, but the effects of daily variation in urine dilution on diagnostic accuracy are not clearly known. This study evaluated the effects of urine concentration on the detection of parasite-specific IgG by urine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), particularly in individuals with borderline results or false-negative diagnosis. Optimal concentration conditions were established by comparing Strongyloides-specific IgG antibody levels between unconcentrated and concentrated urine in participants with different infection intensities, namely, healthy control (HC), low-negative (LN), high-negative (HN), and low-positive (LP) groups. The optimal condition was selected and validated in a field trial study. The final urine concentration protocol required centrifugation at 4,000 × g at 4°C for 10 mins using the Amicon concentrator tube. This protocol was validated in groups of participants with various diagnoses according to urine ELISA and fecal examination (n = 148). The concentrated-urine ELISA increased the proportion of positive results in the LN group by 68.2% and by 100% in the HN group. Significantly elevated IgG antibody levels were seen in the LP group. In the group that was false negative by urine ELISA but positive by fecal examination (n = 28), concentrated-urine ELISA yielded 100% positive results. Overall, the frequency estimates of Strongyloides stercoralis were 23.6% by fecal culture, 27% by standard urine ELISA, and 90.5% by concentrated-urine ELISA. The concentration of urine samples prior to analysis by ELISA improved the sensitivity for diagnosis and is potentially useful in the diagnosis of strongyloidiasis in immunocompromised individuals or in low-prevalence areas.