Aims
Clinical trials for therapeutic angiogenesis use blood- or bone marrow-derived hematopoietic cells, endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) for vascular regeneration. Recently concerns have emerged that all three cell types could also contribute to atherosclerosis by foam cell formation. Therefore, we asked whether human myelomonocytic cells, EPC or MSC can accumulate lipid droplets (LD) and develop into foam cells.
Conclusions
These data suggest that hematopoietic cell preparations containing monocytes bear the risk of foam cell formation after pro-angiogenic induction. Instead, EPC and MSC may drive vascular regeneration without atherogenesis aggravation. A thorough understanding of cell biology is necessary to develop new strategies combining pro-angiogenic and anti-atherogenic effects during cell therapy.
Methods
LD accumulation was quantified by flow cytometry, confocal microscopy and cholesterol measurement in each of the cell types. The impact of an initial pro-angiogenic induction on subsequent foam cell formation was studied to mimic relevant settings already used in clinical trials. The phosphorylation state of intracellular signaling molecules in response to the pro-angiogenic stimulation was determined to delineate the operative mechanisms and establish a basis for interventional strategies.
Results
Foam cells were formed by monocytes but not by EPC or MSC after pro-angiogenic induction. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) p38 phosphorylation was enhanced and kinase inhibition almost abrogated intracellular LD accumulation in monocytes. Conclusions: These data suggest that hematopoietic cell preparations containing monocytes bear the risk of foam cell formation after pro-angiogenic induction. Instead, EPC and MSC may drive vascular regeneration without atherogenesis aggravation. A thorough understanding of cell biology is necessary to develop new strategies combining pro-angiogenic and anti-atherogenic effects during cell therapy.