Differences in Symptoms and Severity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea between Black and White Patients

黑人和白人患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的症状和严重程度差异

阅读:1

Abstract

Rationale: Prior work suggests that Black patients have more severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) upon clinical presentation. However, the extent to which this may reflect differences in symptoms or other standard measures of OSA risk is unclear. Objectives: We assessed for racial disparities in OSA characteristics at time of initial clinical diagnosis. Methods: Data from 890 newly diagnosed patients with OSA at an urban academic sleep center were included in this analysis. All patients completed a standardized questionnaire on demographics and sleep-related symptoms and underwent laboratory polysomnography. Symptom severity at the time of evaluation was compared across race and sex. Results: Black men were underrepresented in the sleep lab, making up only 15.8% of the cohort and 31.3% of Black participants (P < 0.001). Despite this, Black men had the most severe OSA with a mean apnea hypopnea index of 52.4 ± 39.4 events/hour, compared with 39.0 ± 28.9 in White men, 33.4 ± 32.3 in Black women, and 26.2 ± 23.8 in White women (P < 0.001 for test of homogeneity). Black men also had the greatest burden of OSA symptoms with the highest mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (12.2 ± 5.9 versus 9.4 ± 5.2 in White men, 11.2 ± 5.9, in Black women, and 9.8 ± 5.6 in White women; P < 0.001). Compared with White men, Black men were 1.61 (95% CI [1.04-2.51]) times more likely to have witnessed apneas and 1.56 (95% CI [1.00-2.46]) times more likely to have drowsy driving at the time of OSA diagnosis. Conclusions: At the time of clinical diagnosis, Black men have greater disease severity, suggesting delay in diagnosis. Further, the greater burden of classic OSA symptoms suggests the delayed diagnosis of OSA in Black men is not due to atypical presentation. Further research is needed to identify why screening methods for OSA are not equitably implemented in the care of Black men.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。