A Multidisciplinary Survey Comparing Academic and Community Critical Care Clinicians' Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Practice and the COVID-19 Pandemic

一项多学科调查比较了学术界和社区重症监护临床医生在急性呼吸窘迫综合征诊疗实践和新冠疫情中的情况

阅读:3

Abstract

Rationale: Barriers to recognizing and treating acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exist. Prior studies have not investigated whether these barriers differ between academic and community settings or whether there were differences in critical care clinicians' reported ARDS management strategies during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Objectives: Grounded in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we sought to determine whether there are differences between academic and community critical care clinicians in their team- and intensive care unit (ICU)-based culture; interprofessional communication; knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to ARDS recognition and management; and ICU organization and ARDS management associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Multidisciplinary survey from September 2020 to April 2021 of critical care physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, and respiratory therapists (RTs) in six academic and nine community hospitals across the United States and Canada. Individual item and cumulative domain scores were compared between academic and community clinicians. Statistical adjustment was performed for multiple comparisons. Results: A total of 1,906 clinicians responded to at least one survey item (53% response rate). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) culture scores were higher for community physicians versus academic physicians (5.3 [1.8] vs. 4.4 [2.0]; P < 0.001) and community nurses versus academic nurses (4.4 [2.2] vs. 3.8 [2.1]; P = 0.007). Academic nurses and RTs had higher knowledge scores than community nurses and RTs (P < 0.001 for each comparison). Community physicians, nurses, and RTs reported higher mean (SD) number of changes in ICU organization and practice during the COVID-19 pandemic than academic clinicians (e.g., community physicians: 13.7 [2.7] changes vs. academic physicians: 11.8 [4.3] changes; P = 0.001). Although academic physicians, nurses, and RTs were approximately twice as likely to care for patients with ARDS daily or several days per week compared with community clinicians, ARDS management, attitudes, and belief in evidence was similar between academic and community clinicians in most respects. Conclusions: A large, multidisciplinary survey identified differences between academic and community critical care clinicians' culture and knowledge in the care of patients with ARDS. The COVID-19 pandemic had a greater impact on community ICU organization and ARDS management. Multifaceted implementation strategies should target implementation barriers differently in academic and community settings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。