Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current reference standard to diagnose a SARS-CoV-2 infection is real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). This test poses substantial challenges for large-scale community testing, especially with respect to the long turnaround times. SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests are an alternative, but typically use a lateral flow assay format rendering them less suitable for analysis of large numbers of samples. METHODS: We conducted an evaluation of the Diasorin SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay (DAA) compared to real-time RT-PCR (Abbott). The study was performed on 248 (74 qRT-PCR positive, 174 qRT-PCR negative) clinical combined oro-nasopharyngeal samples of individuals with COVID-19-like symptoms obtained at a Municipal Health Service test centre. In addition, we evaluated the analytical performance of DAA with a 10-fold dilution series of SARS-CoV-2 containing culture supernatant and compared it with the lateral flow assay SARS-CoV-2 Roche/SD Biosensor Rapid Antigen test (RRA). RESULTS: The DAA had an overall specificity of 100% (95%CI 97.9%-100%) and sensitivity of 73% (95%CI 61.3%-82.7%) for the clinical samples. Sensitivity was 86% (CI95% 74.6%-93.3%) for samples with Ct-value below 30. Both the DAA and RRA detected SARS-CoV-2 up to a dilution containing 5.2 × 10(2) fifty-percent-tissue-culture-infective-dose (TCID50)/ml. DISCUSSION: The DAA performed adequately for clinical samples with a Ct-value below 30. Test performance may be further optimised by lowering the relative light unit (RLU) threshold for positivity assuming the in this study used pre-analytical protocol . The test has potential for use as a diagnostic assay for symptomatic community-dwelling individuals early after disease onset in the context of disease control.