Fear of venepuncture as a barrier to testing for blood-borne infection and use of an oral fluid test as an alternative to venepuncture in a genitourinary medicine clinic

在泌尿生殖医学诊所,对静脉穿刺的恐惧阻碍了血液传播感染的检测,因此采用口腔液检测作为静脉穿刺的替代方案。

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A survey of 505 consecutive patients attending a UK genitourinary medicine clinic (GUM) included a psychometric tool to compute a fear of venepuncture (FOV) score, responses to the offer of venepuncture and to alternative testing. METHOD: An oral fluid test (OFT) was available to test for blood-borne infection (BBI). Completed fear scores were provided by 299 (59%) patients routinely offered venepuncture, of whom 72 (24%) who did not have venepuncture had higher fear scores compared with 227 (76%) who had venepuncture (p<0.001). RESULTS: Both FOV and female sex were independent predictors of not having venepuncture. CONCLUSIONS: FOV is an important barrier to uptake of venepuncture. FOV may not always be recognised by health carers. OFT is an acceptable alternative test for some patients with needle aversion who decline venepuncture.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。