Synchronizing systolic calcium release with azumolene in an experimental model

在实验模型中利用阿祖莫林同步收缩期钙释放

阅读:6
作者:Daoyuan Si, Praloy Chakraborty, Mohammed Ali Azam, Madhav Krishna Kumar Nair, Stéphane Massé, Patrick F H Lai, Christopher Labos, Sheila Riazi, Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar

Background

Post-defibrillation myocardial contractile dysfunction adversely affects the survival of patients after cardiac arrest. Attenuation of diastolic calcium (Ca2+) overload by stabilization of the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) is found to reduce refibrillation after long-duration ventricular fibrillation (LDVF).

Conclusion

Treatment with azumolene is associated with improvement of systolic Ca2+ release synchrony and myocardial contractility following ischemic LDVF.

Methods

After completion of baseline optical mapping, Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts were subjected to global ischemia followed by reperfusion with azumolene or deionized distilled water (vehicle). Following reperfusion, LDVF was induced with burst pacing. In the first series of experiments (n = 16), epicardial Ca2+ transient was analyzed for Ca2+ transient amplitude alternans and dispersion of Ca2+ transient amplitude alternans index (CAAI). In the second series of experiments following the same protocol (n = 12), ventricular contractility was assessed by measuring the left ventricular pressure.

Objective

In the present study, we explored the effects of RyR2 stabilization by azumolene on systolic Ca2+ release synchrony and myocardial contractility.

Results

Ischemic LDVF led to greater CAAI (0.06 ± 0.02 at baseline vs 0.12 ± 0.02 post-LDVF, P < .01) and magnitude of dispersion of CAAI (0.04 ± 0.01 vs 0.09 ± 0.01, P < .01) in control hearts. In azumolene-treated hearts, no significant changes in CAAI (0.05 ± 0.01 vs 0.05 ± 0.01, P = .84) and dispersion of CAAI (0.04 ± 0.01 vs 0.04 ± 0.01, P = .99) were noted following ischemic LDVF. Ischemic LDVF was associated with reduction in left ventricular developed pressure (100% vs 36.8% ± 6.1%, P = .002) and dP/dtmax (100% vs 45.3% ± 6.5%, P = .003) in control hearts, but these reductions were mitigated (left ventricular developed pressure: 100% vs 74.0% ± 8.1%, P = .052, dP/dtmax: 100% vs 80.8% ± 7.9%, P = .09) in azumolene-treated hearts.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。