Sex Differences in the Safety and Efficacy of Different Durations of DAPT After PCI

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后不同疗程双联抗血小板治疗的安全性和有效性的性别差异

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the clinical impact of abbreviating the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and have reported outcomes in men and women. OBJECTIVES: The authors examined the safety and efficacy of different durations of DAPT following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in men and women. METHODS: We searched Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for RCTs that compared any 2 of 1, 3, 6, or 12 months of DAPT after PCI and reported outcomes in men and women. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to examine sex-based differences in net adverse clinical events (NACE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and bleeding. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs were included, comprising 44,610 men (74.7%) and 15,132 women (25.3%). No difference in NACE or MACE was observed between 1, 3, 6, or 12 months of DAPT in both sexes. In both men and women, 1 and 3 months of DAPT were each associated with lower risk of bleeding compared with 12 months of DAPT. In women, 3 months of DAPT was associated with a lower risk of bleeding compared with 6 months. Similar results were found in sensitivity analysis of acute coronary syndrome-only trials. CONCLUSIONS: No significant sex-based differences in NACE or MACE were observed with different durations of DAPT after PCI, while a lower bleeding risk was observed with shorter DAPT (1-3 months) among both sexes. This suggests that shorter DAPT may be preferred in both sexes following PCI, especially in those with high bleeding risk.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。