Abstract
Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a valuable surgical method for limb lengthening and bone defect correction, but its lengthy consolidation phase presents challenges. The accordion technique (AT), involving compression and distraction of bone segments, has shown potential for enhancing healing. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the AT conducted at three different time points (distraction phase, early consolidation phase, or late consolidation phase) compared to conventional DO in a mouse osteotomy model. Healing was evaluated using in vivo microCT, histology, and computational modeling. Results showed that bridging frequency, BV, and callus tissue composition were similar between conventional DO and late consolidation AT. In contrast, distraction phase AT led to delayed healing at day 15 with a 72% reduction in BV compared to DO, but no significant differences by the endpoint. Early consolidation AT showed significantly impaired healing compared to DO, with only 29% of mice achieving bony bridging, and significantly reduced bone marrow area of the endpoint callus. In silico modeling was generally predictive of in vivo findings and suggested that application of the AT during early consolidation results in destruction of newly-formed vascular tissue. Overall, no benefit was observed for the AT compared to conventional DO with the parameters employed in this study.