Prognostic Value of the TAPSE/PASP Ratio in Lung Transplant Candidates With Advanced Interstitial Lung Disease

TAPSE/PASP 比值在晚期间质性肺疾病肺移植候选者中的预后价值

阅读:2

Abstract

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is a critical yet often underrecognized determinant of prognosis in patients with advanced interstitial lung disease (ILD) undergoing lung transplant evaluation. The tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) ratio has emerged as a promising noninvasive echocardiographic surrogate of RV-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling, offering a dynamic estimate of RV function relative to afterload. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we assessed the prognostic association of the TAPSE/PASP ratio in 65 lung transplant candidates with advanced ILD. All patients underwent comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography and right heart catheterization as part of pre-transplant evaluation. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or lung transplantation. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, 33 patients (50.8%) reached this endpoint. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified an optimal TAPSE/PASP cutoff value of 0.55 (AUC: 0.763, p < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 75% for predicting adverse outcomes. Patients with TAPSE/PASp < 0.55 exhibited significantly worse transplant-free survival (log-rank p = 0.0057), more pronounced RV structural and functional impairment, and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, TAPSE/PASP was the sole independent predictor of the primary outcome (HR: 0.09, p = 0.01). These findings suggest that the TAPSE/PASP ratio may constitute a feasible and reproducible noninvasive surrogate of RV-pulmonary arterial uncoupling and could facilitate the identification of high-risk individuals among lung transplant candidates with advanced interstitial lung disease. However, in light of the retrospective and single-center nature of this study, the results should be interpreted with caution as hypothesis-generating, and further validation in large-scale, prospective, multicenter cohorts is warranted.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。