Editorial on "Elective Thoracic Surgical Resections for Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations-A 16 Year Single-Center Experience"

关于“择期胸外科手术切除治疗肺动静脉畸形——16 年单中心经验”的社论

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Secondary management of thermal injuries remains a challenging and relevant topic for plastic surgeons. Burn scars are associated with both functional and aesthetic issues for patients. While various treatments exist, there is no gold standard of treatment. Fat grafting has been used in multiplicities in reconstruction, and studies have demonstrated improvement in skin texture and contour following infiltration. This systematic review aims to examine all available evidence on outcomes following fat grafting for management of burn scars. METHODS: A search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane library database was conducted from their inception until June of 2023. Published articles examining outcomes of fat grafting for thermal injury scars were identified, screened, and extracted as per PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 10457 articles were screened, yielding 14 eligible studies for data extraction accounting for 885 patients. All studies found improvement post-operatively. 9 out of 14 studies used a subjective clinical assessment, one study did not report pre-treatment measurements, the other 8 all found improved outcome based on clinician assessment. One study reported VSS and another reported modified VSS. 3 studies utilized POSAS, the mean difference was an improvement of 7.28 (MCID < 1). CONCLUSIONS: Further studies, particularly prospective in nature, with standardized outcome measurements are needed to substantiate clinical improvement observed. The authors recommend utilizing either the POSAS or VSS for future studies investigating burn scar treatments. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: This study investigates all concurrent and relevant studies looking at utilizing fat grafting in the management of burn scars. Evidence present is overall supportive of its efficacy. However, meaningful analysis was precluded due to inconsistent outcome reporting. We recommend all studies going forward on this topic to use established tools or PROMs such as the POSAS or VSS. FUNDING FOR THE STUDY: N/A

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。