Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Concerns about the indications for the surgical removal of third molars have not yet reached a decisive agreement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the perception and practice of Saudi' dentists when encountering third molars clinical situations including diagnosis, treatment, and postsurgical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted and approved by the ethics research committee at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz (PSAU). The survey comprised of four sets of questions with multiple-choice answers including the participants' details and type of practice (private or government), clinical awareness and attitude regarding lower third molars surgery, and the confidence level of dentists when performing third molars extraction. The survey was published online with a timeframe of three months to respond. RESULTS: 196 participants responded to the designated survey (55 dental interns and 141 general dental practitioners (GPs)). Most responses (80.1%) were from Riyadh province (central region). There was a significant difference between GPs and interns in terms of impacted third molars with associated cystic lesions, bony impactions, and diffuse pain (P < 0.05). Male dentists tend to prescribe antibiotics more than female dentists (P = 0.001) and GPs more than interns (P = 0.027). The results also indicated that male dentists were more confident than females when performing third molar extraction. Generally, female dentists preferred to have further training on such surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Continuing professional development programs both during dental internship and general practice are recommended to improve the required skills of third molar extraction.