Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Pulp stones are discrete calcified masses appearing in the dental pulp of healthy, disease and unerupted teeth. They are presented freely within the pulp tissue or attached and embedded in any part of coronal and radicular dentin. Here, the purposes of this study were to identify the presence of pulp stones in periodontal patients using digital panoramic and periapical radiographies, and to determine the association with gender, age, tooth type and dental arch. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study on selected records of 465 dental samples obtained between January and December, 2020. Data were collected from patients diagnosed with generalized chronic periodontitis and accepted the full periodontal treatment covered by the Government's Periodontal Health Care Program. Their digital panoramic (DPR) examination and full mouth periapical radiographic (DPA) examination (including 12 periapical and 4 bitewing images) were performed at the Outpatient Clinics of the Department of Stomatology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital. Patients were segregated into various groups according to their age, gender and tooth locations. All radiographic images were examined by a dental radiologist and two dentists to identify the presence of pulp stone calcifications and their associated factors using the Sirona applications software. Records were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0 based on tests of Pearson Chi-square and McNemar correlation. RESULTS: From 271 males and 194 females, a total of 465 DPR and 7440 DPA radiographs were studied. Pulp stone calcifications were identified in 270 (58.0%) subjects in DPR images and 348 (74.8%) subjects in DPA images (for 1 or more teeth per subject). We detected calcified opacities in 1031 teeth with DPR images and in 1326 teeth with DPA images from a total of 12,407 teeth. The incidence of pulp stones was similar across genders, but different in tooth locations and dental arch sextant. Moreover, pulp stones were detected more often on maxillary molars and subjects of old ages (>40 years). Digital panoramic and periapical radiography showed significant differences in the detection of pulp stone calcifications (P < 0.05), and detected better with digital periapical radiography examination. CONCLUSION: We found 58.0% (n = 645) of our patients with pulp stones using digital panoramic radiography, and 74.8% using digital periapical radiography. Regarding individual teeth, only 8.5% of pulp stones were observed in digital panoramic radiography and 10.6% in digital periapical radiography. Pulp stones were more often seen in maxillary molar teeth and old patients of ages >40 years old using periapical radiography examination especially in those patients with periodontally condition. As a two-dimensional imaging system, digital periapical radiography is recommended for a definitive and routine assessment in patients suspected of hard tissue abnormality and pulp calcification formation.