Abstract
Orthotopic tumor animal models are optimal for preclinical research of novel therapeutic interventions. The aim of the present study was to compare two types of ovarian cancer orthotopic xenograft (OCOX) mouse models, i.e. cellular orthotopic injection (COI) and surgical orthotopic implantation (SOI), regarding xenograft formation rate, in vivo imaging, tumor growth and metastasis, and tumor microenvironment. The tumor formation and progression were monitored by bioluminescent in vivo imaging. Cell proliferation and migration abilities were detected by EdU and scratch assays, respectively. Expression of α-SMA, CD34, MMP2, MMP9, vimentin, E-cadherin and Ki67 in tumor samples were detected by immunohistochemistry. As a result, we successfully established COI- and SOI-OCOX mouse models using ovarian cancer cell lines ES2 and SKOV3. The tumor formation rate in the COI and SOI models were 87.5 and 100%, respectively. Suspected tumor cell leakage occurred in 37.5% of the COI models. The SOI xenografts grew faster, held larger primary tumors, and were more metastatic than the COI xenografts. The migration and proliferation properties of the cells that generated SOI xenografts were significantly starker than those deriving COI xenografts in vitro. The tumor cells in SOI xenografts exhibited a mesenchymal phenotype and proliferated more actively than those in the COI xenografts. Additionally, compared with the COI tumors, the SOI tumors contained more cancer associated fibroblasts, matrix metallopeptidase 2 and 9. In conclusion, SOI is a feasible and reliable technique to establish OCOX mouse models mimicking the clinical process of ovarian cancer growth and metastasis, although SOI is more technically difficult and time-consuming than COI.