Validation of methods for effective orifice area measurement of prosthetic valves by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography following transcatheter self-expanding aortic valve implantation

经导管自膨式主动脉瓣置换术后,二维和多普勒超声心动图对人工瓣膜有效孔口面积测量方法的验证

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effective orifice area (EOA) is utilized to characterize the hemodynamic performance of the transcatheter heart valve (THV). However, there is no consensus on EOA measurement of self-expanding THV. We aimed to compare two echocardiographic methods for EOA measurement following transcatheter self-expanding aortic valve implantation. METHODS: EOA was calculated according to the continuity equation. Two methods were constructed. In Method 1 and Method 2, the left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) was measured at the entry of the prosthesis (from trailing-to-leading edge) and proximal to the prosthetic valve leaflets (from trailing-to- leading edge), respectively. The velocity-time integral (VTI) of the LVOT (VTI(LVOT)) was recorded by pulsed-wave Doppler (PW) from apical windows. The region of the PW sampling should match that of the LVOTd measurement with precise localization. The mean transvalvular pressure gradient (MG) and VTI of THV was measured by Continuous wave Doppler. RESULTS: A total of 113 consecutive patients were recruited. The mean age was 77.2 ± 5.5 years, and 72 patients (63.7%) were male. EOA(1) with the use of Method 1 was larger than EOA(2) (1.56 ± 0.39 cm(2) vs. 1.48 ± 0.41 cm(2), P = 0.001). MG correlated better with the indexed EOA(1) (EOAI(1)) (r = -0.701, P < 0.001) than EOAI(2) (r = -0.645, P < 0.001). According to EOAI (EOAI ≤ 0.65 cm(2)/m(2), respectively), the proportion of sever prosthesis-patient mismatch with the use of EOA(1) was lower than EOA(2) (12.4% vs. 21.2%, P < 0.05). Compared with EOA(2), EOA(1) had lower interobserver and intra-observer variability (intra: 0.5% ± 17% vs. 3.8% ± 22%, P < 0.001; inter: 1.0% ± 9% vs. 3.5% ± 11%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For transcatheter self-expanding valve EOA measurement, LVOTd should be measured in the entry of the prosthesis stent (from trailing-to-leading edge), and VTI(LVOT) should match that of the LVOTd measurement with precise localization.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。