Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: We assessed direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and a history of injection drug use (IDU) in Japan. METHOD: This retrospective observational study was based on clinical records. Overall, 804 DAA-naïve HCV-infected patients were enrolled, treated with a 12-week regimen of DAAs, and had available information about a history of IDU. Anti-HCV efficacy was defined as a sustained viral response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) only in patients who were assessed after 12 weeks [modified intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses]. We compared the antiviral effect between patients with (past-IDU) and without a history of IDU (non-IDU). We also evaluated the characteristics of each group, including the overall dropout rate and economic background. RESULTS: Overall, 78 (9.7%) patients had a history of IDU. Compared to the non-IDU group at baseline, the past-IDU group consisted of predominantly male and younger patients infected with HCV genotype 2. Overall, 3% (3/78) and 16% (116/726) of the patients had cirrhosis in the past-IDU and non-IDU group, respectively. There was a significantly higher rate of welfare recipients in the past-IDU group. SVR rate was 97% (59/61) in the past-IDU group and 99% (689/699) in the non-IDU group. The cumulative rate of dropout from an aftercare program was high in the past-IDU group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: DAAs had a remarkable anti-HCV effect in patients with past-IDU who continued in an aftercare program. It is necessary to understand the characteristics of past-IDU patients to establish a support system for aftercare programs.