Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in high-risk patients. However, the value of escalating LLT when the LDL-C targets are achieved with moderate-intensity statins is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of LLT escalation in this population. METHODS: In this retrospective propensity score-matched study, we screened data from two university hospitals between 2006 and 2021. Of the 54,069 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), 3,205 who achieved LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL with moderate-intensity statins were included. After 1:3 matching, 1,315 patients (339 with LLT escalation and 976 without) were ultimately examined. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)1 (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal ischemic stroke) and all-cause death. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5.7 years, the MACCE1 rate was not significantly lower in the escalation group than in the non-escalation group (9.8 and 14.3/1,000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.09; p=0.11). Kaplan-Meier curves showed similar results (log-rank p=0.11). The risk of all-cause death did not differ between the groups. MACCE2 rate, which additionally includes coronary/peripheral revascularization, was lower in the escalation group (24.5 and 35.4/1,000 person-years, respectively; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.94; p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: LLT escalation did not significantly lower hard cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause death in patients with ASCVD achieving LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL with moderate-intensity statins. However, it had benefit in reducing revascularization rates in this population.