Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the main curative treatment for periampullary carcinoma (PAC), but the high risk of complications in PD means an accurate preoperative diagnosis is essential, because benign lesions can be treated without PD. Despite as the preferred diagnosis method, preoperative endoscopic biopsy is characterized with high false-negative rate, which disturbs the making of surgical plans. We explored the degree of matching between preoperative and postoperative pathological diagnoses, analyzed the shortcomings of endoscopic biopsy, and provide recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of periampullary tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 198 patients with periampullary tumors who underwent endoscopic biopsy and PD between June 2013 and February 2021. Data on disease characteristics, such as sex, age, total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL), tumor markers, imaging features, preoperative and postoperative pathology were collected and reviewed. The measurement data with normal distribution were expressed by mean ± standard deviation, and the categorical data were expressed by the number of cases. RESULTS: In our cohort, 196 patients (98.99%) were diagnosed with PAC based on postoperative pathology. Preoperative pathological biopsy was performed in 198 patients with dysplasia (n=76), inflammation (n=7), and PAC (n=115), among whom 111 were diagnosed with PAC at the first biopsy and 4/7 at the second biopsy. The false-negative rate for one preoperative biopsy was 85/196 (43.37%); 74/76 (97.37%) patients in the dysplasia subgroup and 7/7 (100%) patients in the inflammation subgroup showed malignant results after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative endoscopic biopsy has a high false-negative rate. Multiple sites, greater depth, and more biopsies may increase accuracy. Patients preoperatively diagnosed with dysplasia have a high risk for cancer and are recommended to undergo PD directly.