Validation of HPV triage in cytology-based cervical cancer screening for ASC-US cases using Japanese data

利用日本数据验证基于细胞学的宫颈癌筛查中针对ASC-US病例的HPV分流策略

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In Japan, cervical cancer screening consists of a cytology examination performed once every 2 years. We verified whether the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 disease or higher (CIN3+) was equivalent to that of cytology negative cases (negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy [NILM]) for patients with a cytological diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US)" who tested negative for human papillomavirus (HPV). METHODS: Data from a total of 22,925 cases who had undergone cervical cancer screening at least twice or who had completed follow-up examinations after cervical screening at a single facility between April 2013 and April 2018 were analyzed. The cumulative incidence of CIN3+ was calculated for each category of initial cytology finding and HPV result (NILM, > ASC-US, ASC-US/HPV (unknown), ASC-US/HPV(+), and ASC-US/HPV(-)). The statistical analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The hazard ratio for the cumulative incidence of CIN3+ in 2 years relative to that for NILM cases was 2.7 (95% confidence interval=1.0-7.8) for > ASC-US cases, 0.5 (0.1-1.7) for ASC-US/HPV (unknown), 0.8 (0.3-2.4) for ASC-US/HPV(+) cases, and 0.3 (0.1-1.0) for ASC-US/HPV(-) cases. CONCLUSION: Because the cumulative incidence of CIN3+ at 2 years for the ASC-US/HPV(-) cases was sufficiently low, compared with that of the NILM cases, we considered it reasonable and safe to perform HPV triage for ASC-US cases and to allow HPV-negative cases to return for their next screening in 2 years, which is the same follow-up schedule as that for NILM cases.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。