Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin for Restless Legs Syndrome in Korean Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

普瑞巴林治疗韩国成年人不宁腿综合征的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of pregabalin in Korean adults with restless legs syndrome (RLS). METHODS: In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 78 patients with RLS with an International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) score ≥15 were randomized 1:1 to receive either pregabalin (n=39) or placebo (n=39) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in the IRLS score, and the secondary outcomes included the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale and changes in scores on other RLS symptom questionnaires. Safety was assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04161027). RESULTS: At baseline, the mean IRLS scores were 23.2±5.8 in the pregabalin and 24.5±5.2 in the placebo group (p=0.297). After 12 weeks, the baseline-adjusted change in the IRLS score was -6.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] -9.3 to -4.3) in the pregabalin group and -5.4 (95% CI -7.9 to -2.8) in the placebo group, with no significant difference between the groups (p=0.420). The secondary efficacy outcomes did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of TEAE was similar between the two groups (48.7% vs. 51.3%, p=0.821), with dizziness being the most common TEAE. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to demonstrate the therapeutic effect of pregabalin compared with placebo for RLS in Korean adults. Possible reasons for the negative results include low dose, insufficient sample size, and substantial placebo response. Further investigations are warranted to optimize pregabalin therapy in Korean adults with RLS.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。