eHealth tools to improve the health-related quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients in developing countries: a systematic review protocol

利用电子健康工具改善发展中国家癌症患者家庭照护者的健康相关生活质量:系统评价方案

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ehealth improves the health-related quality of life for cancer patients and their families by providing easier access to medical information, promoting self-management, and providing personalised care through digital platforms. However, there is still a dearth of comprehensive understanding of their influences in developing countries. OBJECTIVES: To identify several ehealth interventions accessible to family caregivers of people with cancer in developing countries and to assess the impact of these interventions on their health-related quality of life. METHODS: The review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. Health databases and search engines, including PubMed, Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, and CINAHL via EBSCOhost, will be used. We will include quantitative or mixed method research evaluating e-health, with a particular emphasis on the health-related quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients. Studies from developing countries, including peer-reviewed journals and grey literature, will be considered without regard to publication date.The study selection process involves screening titles and abstracts for relevance, then, doing a full-text assessment against the inclusion criteria. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised controlled trials and ROBINS-I V2 for non-randomised studies will be employed to assess the quality of the included studies. The A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews will assess the quality of this systematic review. IMPLICATIONS: This review offers a thorough and impartial summary of current research on e-health tools and their impact on the health-related quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients. It seeks to inform evidence-based decision-making across healthcare, policy development, and research design by identifying knowledge gaps, emphasising areas requiring further investigation, and steering future research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024622302 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024622302.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。