Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent airflow limitation that is usually progressive and associated with an enhanced chronic inflammatory response in the airway and the lung to noxious particles or gases. Sputum production is a cardinal feature in COPD. Airway clearance techniques have been the mainstay of management. Oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) devices are handheld devices that provide a combination of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) with high frequency oscillations which involve exhaling against a resistance that is fluctuating. It encourages airflow within secretions, whereas oscillations induce vibrations within airway wall to displace secretions into airway lumen and help in expectoration. METHODS: A randomized control trial was conducted at the department of pulmonary medicine, Government Medical College & Hospital, Chandigarh, in which 50 patients with stable COPD were enrolled for one- and- half years. After taking proper history, they were subjected to spirometry, six- minute walk test, and were asked to fill the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT). These patients were randomized into group A (intervention group) and group B (control group), where group A was prescribed Aerobika OPEP device for daily use for a period of three months. After three months of use of device, the patients were again subjected to assessment parameters and inquired about any exacerbation within the three- month period. RESULTS: At the end of three months were compared with baseline results. The median change in FEV1, FVC, 6MWD from baseline in group A was significantly more as compared to group B (FEV1: P < 0.001; FVC: P < 0.001; 6MWD: P = 0.08), whereas SGRQ score showed a significant improvement in both the intervention and control groups (P < 0.001) and CAT score showed significant improvement in comparison to the control group (P < 0.001). The median change in 6MWD and CAT from baseline in group A was significantly more as compared to group B (SGRQ: P < 0.001; CAT: P < 0.001), whereas it was not significant in case of SGRQ (P = 0.233). There was no significant difference in the incidence of exacerbation in the two groups (P = 0.19). The device did not help in controlling the rate of exacerbation in the present study at three months. CONCLUSION: Stable COPD patients who were given OPEP therapy as an adjunct to the standard drug therapy showed improvement in the spirometry parameters, exercise capacity and symptom burden in comparison to the drug only group.