Combining four screening tools for cost effective screening of OSA in train drivers: A UK experience

结合四种筛查工具,以经济高效的方式筛查火车司机中的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:英国的经验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in drivers/workers has been implicated in railway and road traffic safety incidents; however, there are insufficient data on its prevalence and cost-effective screening methods. AIM: This pragmatic study examines four OSA screening tools: the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), the STOP-Bang (SB), the adjusted neck circumference (ANC) and the body mass index (BMI), exploring their suitability and effectiveness separately and in combination. METHOD: Using all four tools, 292 train drivers were opportunistically screened between 2016 and 2017. A polygraph (PG) test was carried out when OSA was suspected. Patients with an apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 were referred to a clinical specialist and reviewed annually. Those who had continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment were evaluated for compliance and control. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients who had PG testing, 3 and 23 participants met the ESS >10 and SB >4, criteria, respectively, whereas 25 participants each had an ANC >48 and a BMI >35 with a risk factor or ≥40 with none. OSA was detected in 3, 18 and 16 of them who met the ESS, SB and ANC criteria, respectively, and was positive for OSA in addition to 16 others who met the BMI criteria. A total of 28 (72%) were diagnosed with OSA. CONCLUSION: Although when used individually, these screening methods are less effective/inadequate, combining them is easy, feasible and offers the maximum chance of OSA detection in train drivers.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。