Cone beam computed tomography-guided bronchoscopic sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions: The first Indian experience

锥形束计算机断层扫描引导下支气管镜取样检测周围肺部病变:印度首例经验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional bronchoscopic approaches have a lower diagnostic yield (DY) compared to transthoracic biopsy for sampling peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided bronchoscopy overcomes the limitations of conventional bronchoscopy techniques. This study evaluates DY, predictors of success, and safety of CBCT-guided bronchoscopy for PPL biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent CBCT-guided biopsy for PPLs between November 2023 and November 2024. Clinico-radiologic and procedural details, tool-in-lesion (TIL) relationships, DY, factors predicting DY, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 183 patients who underwent bronchoscopic sampling of PPL during study period, 50 patients underwent CBCT-guided biopsy. The overall DY of CBCT biopsy was 88% (44/50). A type 1 TIL (tool within lesion) was obtained in 57% (28/49), type 2 TIL (tool touch lesion) in 35% (17/49), and a type 3 TIL (tool away from lesion) in four cases. The factors predicting DY were size of lesion and the tool-lesion relationship. DY increased with increasing size of PPL and decreased the farther the tool was from the center of the target. The DY was 100%, 82%, and 25% for lesions with type 1, type 2, and type 3 TIL, respectively ( P = 0.024). CBCT biopsy was safe with no procedural mortality, no pneumothorax, and moderate to severe bleed in seven cases. CONCLUSION: CBCT-guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions is safe and has a DY of 88%. DY is higher for lesions ≥2 cm and when the tool is within the lesion (type 1 TIL) on CBCT spin.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。