Transcanal Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Tympanoplasty: Is There a Difference in Perforation Closure Rates?

经耳道内镜鼓室成形术与显微镜鼓室成形术:鼓膜穿孔闭合率有差异吗?

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare closure rates of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty (MT) as influenced by perforation size, perforation location, and graft position. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary university medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients who underwent tympanoplasty by a fellowship-trained neurotologist from January 2010 to December 2019, had at least 2 months of follow-up, and had a tympanic perforation with no cholesteatoma before surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) or MT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is postoperative closure of the tympanic membrane perforation as assessed using otomicroscopy at the last follow-up appointment. RESULTS: Two-hundred and eleven patients-98 in the transcanal ET group and 113 in the MT group-were identified. Tympanic membrane closure rates were not significantly different between the ET and MT groups (79.6% and 84.1% respectively; P = 0.473), and further multivariable analysis revealed that closure rates for ET relative to MT had an insignificant odds ratio (0.56; P = 0.144). Similar analyses also found no significant difference between the 2 methods in subsets of perforation size (small, large, subtotal/total), perforation location (anterior, posterior, inferior), and graft position (underlay, overlay). CONCLUSIONS: ET resulted in similar rates of postoperative closure rates compared with the microscopic technique.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。