Comparative efficacy of certoparin, enoxaparin, and combined thromboprophylaxis on thromboembolic events after glioblastoma resection: a prospective observational study

塞妥帕林、依诺肝素和联合血栓预防对胶质母细胞瘤切除术后血栓栓塞事件的疗效比较:一项前瞻性观察研究

阅读:1

Abstract

Thromboembolic events (TE) are serious complications following glioblastoma (GBM) resection. This retrospective study analyzed 695 GBM patients (2017-2022, University Hospital Dresden) to assess the impact of different anticoagulant regimens-certoparin, enoxaparin, and enoxaparin with intermittent pneumatic stockings (IPS)-along with patient comorbidities, on TE incidence. Overall, 28 patients (4%) developed TE. The highest combined incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred in the enoxaparin group (8.6%), followed by certoparin (6.9%) and enoxaparin + IPS (2.6%) (p = .003). Increased PE risk was associated with longer surgery duration (median 249 vs. 190 min; p = .002), greater intraoperative blood loss (300 vs. 150 mL; p = .002), and older age (> 65 years, p = .043). Comorbidities such as diabetes (p = .005) and coronary heart disease (p = .037) were also linked to elevated TE risk. Multivariate analysis identified enoxaparin alone as an independent risk factor (HR 0.312; CI 0.116-0.842; p = .022). Patients with PE or DVT had surgeries that were on average 45 min longer and involved higher blood loss. GBM patients treated with enoxaparin alone have a significantly higher risk for TE compared to treatment with certoparin or the combination of enoxaparin with IPS. Additionally, the duration of surgery, patient age and comorbidities significantly influence the risk of postoperative TE.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。