Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Little is known about how patients make decisions about and prioritize therapies and disease management in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We aimed to systematically identify and characterize patient perspectives and attitudes that influence decision making for EoE management. METHODS: To understand the diverse attitudes and values of patients with EoE, we designed a study using the Q-method. We iteratively developed 31 statements related to EoE disease management. Participants sorted statements by ranking from +4 (most agree) to -4 (most disagree). By-person factor analysis, using 2-factor and 3-factor rotation, revealed distinct preference archetypes. RESULTS: Thirty-four adults with EoE (mean age 40.9 years, 51.4% male, 82.9% White) were recruited from gastroenterology and allergy clinics from a single center. We identified 2 treatment-centered archetypes: Medication preference, driven by symptoms and the desire to minimize risk of complications and Natural treatment preference , focusing on identifying trigger foods and diet adherence. Three-factor analysis revealed an additional archetype: Treatment ambivalent, a view of EoE as a mild and episodic (not chronic) disease with low priority to treat. Comparison by factor revealed 54% of those in the natural preference archetype were recategorized as treatment ambivalent , suggesting that they see natural treatment as a less complicated or milder strategy and may be at risk of nonadherence and reduced treatment uptake. DISCUSSION: We identified 3 distinct treatment preference archetypes among individuals with EoE, underscoring the need for personalized treatment strategies, especially for those favoring natural approaches but masking ambivalence, and may be at risk of nonadherence or loss to follow-up.