Barriers to and readiness for advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative evidence

预先照护计划的障碍和准备情况:定量和定性证据的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) allows individuals to express their values and preferences for future medical care, yet participation remains low globally. Understanding readiness for ACP and the barriers and facilitators influencing engagement is essential for effective implementation. METHODS: Following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and grey literature up to September 2025. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies involving adults (patients, families, or healthcare providers) were included. Quantitative data on ACP readiness or acceptance were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis, while qualitative data were synthesized thematically. Study quality was appraised using CASP, NOS, and Cochrane RoB tools; certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE and GRADE-CERQual frameworks. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies (n = 15,565 participants) from eight countries met inclusion criteria. Barriers to ACP were identified at the patient (emotional discomfort, limited awareness, cultural taboos), family (overprotection, conflict, poor communication), provider (time constraints, lack of training, role ambiguity), and system (insufficient policies, documentation challenges, and fragmented care) levels. Facilitators included family support, early provider initiation, structured protocols, and culturally sensitive communication. The pooled mean ACP readiness score across four studies (n = 856) was 77.23 (95% CI: 67.86-86.61), indicating moderate readiness with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 99.4%). Readiness was positively associated with family support, prior caregiving experience, and active coping styles. CONCLUSIONS: Global readiness for ACP remains moderate and is constrained by emotional, familial, professional, and systemic barriers. Enhancing communication, training, and supportive institutional frameworks is essential to strengthen ACP engagement and promote person-centered end-of-life care. REGISTRATION: CRD420251172759.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。