Abstract
Immune dysregulation has been reported in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). In the past decade, several trials using anti-inflammatory agents for treatment of SSD have been completed, with so far limited success. One such anti-inflammatory agent used is simvastatin. A recent, large-scale, randomized controlled trial with simvastatin augmentation failed to show improvement in the predefined primary outcome. However, baseline inflammatory profiles were not taken into account. Here we employed a data-driven clustering approach to investigate whether patients with an inflammatory monocyte gene signature respond better to add-on simvastatin treatment than those without such a signature, over a treatment period of 2 years. In 61 patients (60 randomized, 1:1 placebo:simvastatin) and healthy controls, a previously validated monocyte gene expression signature was assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Resulting delta cycle threshold values were used to identify patient clusters. Two major patient clusters with either up- or downregulated pro-inflammatory factors were detected. Linear mixed models showed a significant three-way interaction between the inflammatory cluster, treatment, and time for psychotic symptoms. Only patients treated with simvastatin who were in the inflammatory group, showed a consistent improvement: symptom severity gradually decreased after 3 months and reached significance after 12 and 24 months compared to baseline (p.adj<0.05). The effects were small, and overall between-group effects were not significant. Here, we show that patient stratification based on inflammatory gene expression might be useful to select appropriate treatment augmentation for patients with SSD, highlighting the need for precision medicine approaches. Our findings corroborate the results of the primary analyses, showing that in the overall group, simvastatin was not effective; however, at the individual level the treatment might make a difference.